Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

November 4th, 2024 Community Meeting #252

Closed
qu1queee opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

November 4th, 2024 Community Meeting #252

qu1queee opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@qu1queee
Copy link
Contributor

qu1queee commented Nov 4, 2024

  • Please add a topic in this thread and add a link to the GitHub issue associated with the topic.
  • Please make sure you give folks enough time to review/discuss the topic offline on GitHub before coming into the meeting
  • (optional) Paste the image of an animal 😸
@qu1queee
Copy link
Contributor Author

qu1queee commented Nov 4, 2024

EDIT: Not able to join the meeting per a personal last minute thing

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 changed the title September 4th, 2024 Community Meeting November 4th, 2024 Community Meeting Nov 4, 2024
@SaschaSchwarze0
Copy link
Member

Necessary items for v0.14:

  • Tekton bump needs lgtm
  • Kubernetes bump, min version will be 1.29 (1.28 had eol last week), 1.31 will be newest version. go.mod: 1.30 ? (is 1.29 atm)

@SaschaSchwarze0
Copy link
Member

Karan: is it possible to move the refinement meeting as it is quite late in India?
-> Sascha: maybe even to a different day as attendance is usually low?

Adarsh:

SBOM ship:

  • Adam: SPDX (different versions) vs CyclonDX, what is the state of the industry these days?
  • Sascha: (1) strategy-generated SBOM vs after-the-facts generated SBOM from the container image, (2) format ^, do we need to even convert ?
  • Mahesh: what about signing
    • Mahesh: discussion was in context of SLSA compliance
      -> Adam/Sascha: Image signing is a different topic, both (signing and sbom) have their own complexities and should be separate ships
    • Adam: let's also distinguish what we need to do to make Shipwright SLSA compliance vs what we need to do for our customers to use Shipwright to become SLSA compliant

v0.14

  • Adam: some bau bumps need to happen (like Tekton)
  • Adam: do we want to stick to a coordinated release or can the operator come later ?
  • Adam: should we have versioned docs in the future for the different maintained versions?
    • Sascha: we agreed on maintaining the latest release which means that once v0.14 comes out, we will not make an update on v0.13 anymore; documentation for different releases we should still bring forward
    • Adam: docs for v0.14 vs main
      -> we need an issue in the website repo for that -> Adam will open one
  • Sascha: in general, how strict do we want to handle the "Tekton ships a new LTS -> Shipwright brings our a new build release" idea from [FEATURE] Establish a release cadence based on Tekton LTS releases build#1640 ?
    • Sascha: imo, we are ready for a release. SHIP-0039 for example is partly implemented but the implemented part works and can solve some use cases already.
    • Decision: we start the release after the Tekton and Kubernetes bumps are through

/done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants