Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API Replace Extension subclasses #593

Conversation

emteknetnz
Copy link
Member

@emteknetnz emteknetnz commented Aug 20, 2024

Copy link
Member

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, will hold this one off for last since it has failing tests. Will rerun CI after everything else is merged.

@GuySartorelli
Copy link
Member

CI still failing - I would have said these look unrelated, except the full kitchen sink run was passing so I'd expect this to pass now too.

@emteknetnz emteknetnz force-pushed the pulls/4/replace-extension-subclasses branch from de55844 to 4298c2e Compare August 29, 2024 06:22
@emteknetnz
Copy link
Member Author

Have fixed up the unit tests

Previously there was a fairly point array assertion on extraStatics(), which was a pointless method on DataExtension. I'm not sure why it was passing in sink CI

There was also a failure based on the recently merged protected extensions PR, which I've updated to use the equivalent public API instead

Copy link
Member

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli merged commit 681043c into silverstripe:4 Aug 29, 2024
10 checks passed
@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli deleted the pulls/4/replace-extension-subclasses branch August 29, 2024 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants