You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It shouldn't be too difficult to add overall but I can imagine some awkward cases like ld a,':' : ld b,1 or ld a,1 : defb ":" due to the way pyz80 processes each line. There is some support for tracking inside/outside quotes, which may help avoid unwanted matching against a : in a string, but I can't remember if that understands single quotes too.
I actually found the code in that screenshot to be really hard to read. I don't know if it was the multi-level indentation or the over-use of multi-instruction lines, or a mix of both. I can see the appeal of multi-instruction lines for unrolled loops where there are patterns of a few instructions per processed byte, where it makes the code easier to scan. Though a pyz80 FOR loop might be simpler still, and closer to a macro approach.
I'll probably hold off adding this until solutions are found for the problem cases above.
I'm not sure how feasible this is, but I found the look of this as implemented in sjasmplus (see https://spectrumcomputing.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?p=78268#p78268) rather pleasant.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: