Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed support for old IMA smart contracts without getLastOutgoingMessageBlockId() support on MessageProxy on S-Chain #1545

Conversation

sergiy-skalelabs
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed support for old IMA smart contracts without getLastOutgoingMessageBlockId() support on MessageProxy on S-Chain

…utgoingMessageBlockId() support on MessageProxy on S-Chain
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1545 (93cd23b) into develop (8b8178e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 93cd23b differs from pull request most recent head d49bf83. Consider uploading reports for the commit d49bf83 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1545   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    90.16%   90.16%           
========================================
  Files           26       26           
  Lines         1322     1322           
  Branches       348      348           
========================================
  Hits          1192     1192           
  Misses          33       33           
  Partials        97       97           

@sergiy-skalelabs sergiy-skalelabs merged commit ffe25ba into develop Aug 9, 2023
17 checks passed
@sergiy-skalelabs sergiy-skalelabs deleted the ticket-847/getLastOutgoingMessageBlockId-should-not-be-used-on-schain-part branch August 9, 2023 10:47
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants