diff --git a/vwl6/VL_Sozialismus/hausarbeit/paper.md b/vwl6/VL_Sozialismus/hausarbeit/paper.md index baf592c..a8170f0 100644 --- a/vwl6/VL_Sozialismus/hausarbeit/paper.md +++ b/vwl6/VL_Sozialismus/hausarbeit/paper.md @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ In the following sections, I will outline the key external shocks and their over ## Data -Economic data series for Yugoslavia are notoriously difficult to obtain and often unreliable. Official growth data for the Social Product, Yugoslavia’s equivalent to GDP, are particularly problematic due to price distortions and data fabrication. Therefore, this analysis relies on alternative time series from the Maddison Project Database, which draws on the independent research conducted by the Research Project on National Income in East Central Europe. +Economic data series for Yugoslavia are notoriously difficult to obtain and often unreliable. Official growth data for the Social Product, Yugoslavia’s equivalent to GDP, are particularly problematic due to price distortions and data fabrication. Therefore, this analysis relies on alternative time series from the Maddison Project Database [@boltMaddisonProjectDatabase2024], which draws on the independent research conducted by the Research Project on National Income in East Central Europe. -Many of the additional data sources used throughout this analysis are drawn from the OECD Economic Surveys [@OECDEconomicSurveys]. These biannual surveys, conducted from 1962 to 1990, provide standardized tables on various economic indicators, including foreign trade, debt, balance of payments, and the federal budget, among others. Some of the data in these reports were sourced directly from Yugoslavia’s Official Statistics Office, while other figures were calculated by OECD researchers. Data from these digitized reports have been extracted using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) technology, then transformed into time-series data for further combination and analysis. +Many of the additional data sources used throughout this analysis are drawn from the OECD Economic Surveys [@OECDEconomicSurveys]. These biannual surveys, conducted from 1962 to 1990, provide standardized tables on various economic indicators, including foreign trade, debt, balance of payments, and the federal budget, among others. Some of the data in these reports were sourced directly from Yugoslavia’s Official Statistics Office, while other figures were calculated by OECD researchers. Data from these digitized reports used here has been extracted using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) technology, then transformed into time-series data for further combination and analysis. ## The Effect of the Oil Shocks @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ To cope with rising import prices, a country typically has three options: reduce The second option—boosting exports—proved only partially successful and fell far short of generating the necessary hard currency. Yugoslavia's main trading partners, the members of the European Economic Community (EEC), were grappling with their own macroeconomic challenges. The stagflation of the 1970s, characterized by low growth and high inflation, sharply reduced demand for foreign products, particularly for Yugoslavia’s key export category: finished manufactures. As a result, the external market for Yugoslav goods shrank, further exacerbating the country’s economic difficulties. -**XX GRafik Exporte Machinery** - ### Immigration Restrictions Additionally, countries that had previously been key destinations for Yugoslav emigrants, such as Germany and France, closed their borders to economic migrants. Germany, in particular, ended its "Anwerbeabkommen" (recruitment agreement) in 1973 following the first oil shock, and further tightened immigration rules in 1979 after the second. This shift made it increasingly difficult for Yugoslav workers to find employment abroad, reducing the flow of remittances—an important source of hard currency for Yugoslavia’s economy. @@ -100,9 +98,9 @@ Importance of Remittances for Yugoslavia ### External Debt -The oil crisis precipitated a balance of payments crisis in many countries, including Yugoslavia. To address its growing current account deficit, Yugoslavia turned to Western lenders for assistance. In search of attractive investment opportunities outside their stagnating domestic markets, these Western investors are estimated to have covered approximately 90% of Yugoslavia’s current account deficit up to 1975 [@yarashevichEconomicReasonsBreakYugoslavia2013]. +To address its growing current account deficit in the 1970s, Yugoslavia turned to Western lenders for assistance. In search of attractive investment opportunities outside their stagnating domestic markets, western capitalists willingly invested in emerging markets like Yugoslavia [@babicCausesGrowthYugoslav1986]. They are estimated to have covered approximately 90% of Yugoslavia’s current account deficit up to 1975 with their lending [@yarashevichEconomicReasonsBreakYugoslavia2013]. -This reliance on Western capital would become a significant liability starting in the 1980s. The second oil shock triggered inflationary pressures in the West, particularly in the United States, where the Federal Reserve responded by raising interest rates to as high as 20% in 1981. Emerging economies, including Yugoslavia, felt the impact of these soaring interest rates acutely. They were forced to pay a steep premium to finance their debt and faced escalating costs for servicing it. +This reliance on Western capital would became a significant liability starting in the 1980s. The second oil shock triggered inflationary pressures in the West, particularly in the United States, where the Federal Reserve responded by raising interest rates to as high as 20% in 1981. Emerging economies, including Yugoslavia, felt the impact of these soaring interest rates acutely. They were forced to pay a steep premium to finance their debt and faced escalating costs for servicing it. With the onset of the Mexican debt crisis in 1982, access to foreign credit rapidly dried up for many countries. Foreign lenders quickly pulled back from emerging markets, retreating to safer investments such as US Treasury Bonds. During this period, "Yugoslavia completely lost its access to international financial markets" [@mojmirFormerYugoslaviasDebt1996], leaving the country with no choice but to seek alternative methods for financing essential imports, such as energy, crucial for sustaining its economy. @@ -110,14 +108,12 @@ A major strain on the economy was the debt servicing payments, which escalated t ![Debt Dynamics](./images/debt.png) -### Balance of Payments Crisis - - - ## The Role of the IMF This situation presented a prime opportunity for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which was originally established to manage balance of payments crises as a lender of last resort. During the 1980s, the IMF expanded its role beyond mere stabilization to become a leading advocate for market-liberalizing reforms. As the "world's leading promoter of market-liberalizing reforms" [@kentikelenisMakingNeoliberalGlobalization2019], the IMF began to push for a broader agenda of economic liberalization and structural adjustments in countries facing financial turmoil. +**XX Balance of Payments Yugoslavia** + The IMF's approach during this period involved imposing stringent conditions on countries seeking financial assistance, including market-oriented reforms, privatization, and deregulation. For Yugoslavia, this meant that in addition to securing emergency funding, it was required to implement significant economic reforms that aimed to align its economy more closely with market principles. These reforms were intended to stabilize the economy in the short term but often led to considerable social and economic adjustments, influencing the country's economic trajectory and contributing to the broader wave of neoliberal reforms globally. ## Conclusion diff --git a/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Management.txt b/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Management.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..85883d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Management.txt @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +# 06.11.2024 Management Approaches + +Approaches to Management + +- _Mainstream_ (Scientific Management): Humans of Tools +- _Human Relations Theory_ (HRT): Feelings / Conformity +- _Neoclassic_: Profit + +## Scientific Management + +also known as _Taylorism_ + +- large-scale industry +- induce production increase of workers +- Objective: performance / efficiency + +Elements + +- science for each element of work (time + motion studies) +- scientific selection + training of workers +- cooperation +- division of responisiblity: managers (conception) - workers (execution) + +## Neo Classicals + +- the classic in neoclassic: SM + performance +- the neo: profit maximization over everything + +How? KPIs, Numbers, Measurement + +- empirical approach = practical action and efficiency +- comb. with normative attitude: principles (applicable in all orgs) + +**Premises** + +- Profit maximisation +- Decentrilastion of resp. +- management by objective (MBO) +- self management principle (control by exception) +- motivation by competition + += very american ideals + +**Structures** + +- Functionak Centralized Structure ( +- Divisional Decentralized Structure (Example: Rakuten, Mercedes) +- Matrix organizational structure +- Network Structure +- Agile Scrum Bullshit + + +- modern agile strucutres = more exlusive than bureacratic + - only focused on one type of character (young, male, tech) + - constant pressure + transparency + - find friends at work + - criticism = hold up with surveys / fake participation +- bureacracy + - able to build a long term career + work life balance + - better work benefits + - union organizing to build real criticism +- + + +# Contingency Theory \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Theory.md b/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Theory.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cfe6471 --- /dev/null +++ b/vwl7/VL_Organization/2024-11-06-Theory.md @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +## Organizational Theory + +> **Organization:** set of peopl working together desptec variuos aims, values, cultures + +## Key Parts of Organizations + +1. Environment +2. Technology +3. Participants +4. Social Structure +5. Goals / Objectives + +> **Environment**: +> - Macro: Society, Global +> - Micro: Industry, Market + +> **Participants**: make contributions / derive from org. + +Problem: +- Diffusion of Responsibility +- no Common Aim +- Coordination Problems + +### Organizational Structures + +- Pyramid: Military +- Network: Forum, Mailing List +- Team Spirit: Engineers, Civil Servants + +Processes in Organizations + +- Co-Ordination = planned by authority +- Co-Operation = division of labor, also creates conflict + +> **Effectiveness:** decided by the client, e.g Quality, Price + +> **Efficiency:** measured by management, e.g Quality (devided), Cost, … + +How to measure perfomance? Impossible +- Consistence / Relevance +- Productivity +- Effectiveness += magic triangle + + +### Purpose of Organizations + +- *Instrumental View:* single set of values in org +- *Conflict view:* conflicting values, managers expose, explore, participate +- *Pluralist View:* mixed of everything + +- *Pessimist:)*: Machines of Exclusion + +SPLIT + +- Structure +- Process +- Language +- Idea +- Technology + +## Organizational Theory + +Evolution of OT + +![Organizational](../images/2024-11-06_14-32.jpeg) + +Organization Theorists to name drop: +- Max Weber +- Frederic Taylor +- Taiichi Ohno + +Management Theorists to name drop: +- Henri Fayol +- Peter Drucker + +### Bureaucracy (Weber) + +> Management is the art of getting things done by others +> ~ Marie Follett + +Types of Authority +- Charismatic (e.g Jesus) +- Traditional (Pope) +- Rational - Legal (Doctor with Education) + +Weber: *rational legal authority* is rising = ideal type + +- Authority comes from office +- official duties +- paid, full-time, career structure +- hierarchy + reporting structure +- division of labor +- employment = qualification + experience + +Virtues of B. +- Hierarchy +- Impersonality +- System of Rules + +### Scientific Management (Taylorism) + +Before: small Workshops that produce a whole good + +Characterisics: +- Division of Labor +- Standardisation +- Clear Chain of Command +- Payment linked to production + +Outcomes +- higher productivity +- separate / mundane work +- managers - workers distinction was created \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/vwl7/VL_Organization/Idea.md b/vwl7/VL_Organization/Idea.md index a395ffc..b225c63 100644 --- a/vwl7/VL_Organization/Idea.md +++ b/vwl7/VL_Organization/Idea.md @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ Organizational Structure with Incentives that align - which connections to which stakeholders (other farmers, subscribers, workers) - Idea: - farmers for other types of produce - coop in other parts of the world @@ -36,3 +35,14 @@ Idea: Company: **AGRICO** - Cooperative Farming + +For Essay: + +- include Organizational Structure (functional / division) +- siye of employees: max 10 +- sources / papers / theories in **references** +- conclusion / self assesment of utioia + - limitations (ca. 1 page) + - pros cons +- phyisical space / environment of organization + diff --git a/vwl7/images/2024-11-06_14-32.jpeg b/vwl7/images/2024-11-06_14-32.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..656c1ae Binary files /dev/null and b/vwl7/images/2024-11-06_14-32.jpeg differ