Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JUP-setup jupiter program to swap solana tokens and added functionali… #41

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

i-contemplator
Copy link

…ty to deserialize transactions

@i-contemplator i-contemplator force-pushed the JUP-swap-functionality branch from f196779 to 2d4f179 Compare August 13, 2024 23:40
@skynetcap skynetcap self-assigned this Sep 1, 2024
Copy link
Owner

@skynetcap skynetcap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Will approve the merge once the conflicts are resolved.

Thank you again for the contribution.


public static String swapToken(RpcClient rpcClient, Account account, URI quoteUri) {
JsonNode quote = getJupiterQuote(quoteUri);
return swapToken(rpcClient, account, quote);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this recursion here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is actually calling a different method. I have changed the local variable name to be not confusing.

@slaverda
Copy link

Could someone to fix thesse conflicts, a lot of ppl are waiting for this feature.

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

Could someone to fix thesse conflicts, a lot of ppl are waiting for this feature.

I will take a look today and fix this.

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

Ok. I have fixed the merge conflict. Please let me know if this looks good. For now, I have not added tests but will add them in coming days.

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

Ok, I messed up in my previous commit and removed the commit that actually fixed the conflict. Now, it is fixed and have fixed the conflict.

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

Waiting for the feedback or approval. Thanks!

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

Could someone to fix thesse conflicts, a lot of ppl are waiting for this feature.

Done.

@slaverda
Copy link

Hey guys, any movement here?

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

@slaverda waiting for the approval so can be merged

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

@slaverda conflict has been resolved and you can start using it, but you will have to pull the changes from my branch and build it yourself.

@xbodnar
Copy link

xbodnar commented Jan 8, 2025

@i-contemplator Hi there, are there any blockers on this? The PR seems to be approved, so I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to finalize and merge it. Thanks!

@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

@i-contemplator Hi there, are there any blockers on this? The PR seems to be approved, so I was wondering if you’ve had a chance to finalize and merge it. Thanks!

Hey, sorry. I fixed the conflict earlier and was waiting on the merge as I don't have perms to merge. Between then and now, there is another merge conflict that occurred. Let me get it done now.

@i-contemplator i-contemplator force-pushed the JUP-swap-functionality branch from 72a7ad4 to bff7f38 Compare January 8, 2025 22:38
@i-contemplator
Copy link
Author

@skynetcap @xbodnar i have fixed the merge conflict. Please let me know if it is good and feel free to merge it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants