Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bump memory limit for Cisco 8000 supervisor #16206

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cyw233
Copy link
Contributor

@cyw233 cyw233 commented Dec 24, 2024

Description of PR

Increase the memory threshold for the Cisco 8000 supervisor to 65% to make the test stable.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue) Microsoft ADO 30114189

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

During recent nightly runs, we observed that the Cisco 8000 supervisor had an average memory usage of 59.7% (calculated from the values 60.3, 59.9, 58.9, 59.2, 59.8, and 60.2). Since the memory threshold is set at 60%, this resulted in two failures. To ensure the stability of the tests, we propose increasing the memory threshold for the Cisco 8000 supervisor to 65%.

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

I ran the updated code on Cisco 8000 and can confirm it's working well.

Any platform specific information?

Cisco 8000 chassis

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@cyw233 cyw233 requested a review from prgeor as a code owner December 24, 2024 04:12
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@yejianquan
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @abdosi could you review this PR and confirm whether it aligns with production limitation?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants