Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport PR #2360 on branch v3.6.x (Revert "Add doc for windows latency issue") #2361

Conversation

meeseeksmachine
Copy link

Backport PR #2360: Revert "Add doc for windows latency issue"

@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added this to the 3.6.2 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added the documentation Explanation of code and concepts label Aug 10, 2023
@lumberbot-app lumberbot-app bot added trivial Only needs one approval instead of two no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive 💤 backport-v3.6.x on-merge: backport to v3.6.x labels Aug 10, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (35deeab) 90.72% compared to head (97619a8) 90.72%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           v3.6.x    #2361   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.72%   90.72%           
=======================================
  Files         153      153           
  Lines       17425    17425           
=======================================
  Hits        15809    15809           
  Misses       1616     1616           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kecnry kecnry merged commit da307c7 into spacetelescope:v3.6.x Aug 10, 2023
23 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Explanation of code and concepts no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive trivial Only needs one approval instead of two 💤 backport-v3.6.x on-merge: backport to v3.6.x
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants