Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disallow negative counts conversion factor in Aperture Photometry #3154

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

pllim
Copy link
Contributor

@pllim pllim commented Aug 15, 2024

Description

This pull request is to disallow negative counts conversion factor in Aperture Photometry plugin.

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)? 🐱

@pllim pllim added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 15, 2024
@pllim pllim added this to the 4.0 milestone Aug 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added cubeviz imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations labels Aug 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.83%. Comparing base (d71dc91) to head (d0001d1).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3154      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.82%   88.83%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines       17569    17571       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        15605    15609       +4     
+ Misses       1964     1962       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

pllim and others added 2 commits August 15, 2024 12:44
in not-so-simple-anymore-too-bad aperture photometry plugin.
Co-authored-by: Kyle Conroy <kyleconroy@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@kecnry kecnry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one clarification question, otherwise looks good to me, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@bmorris3 bmorris3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, this will do it!

@pllim pllim merged commit acdc0ca into spacetelescope:main Aug 16, 2024
25 checks passed
@pllim pllim deleted the no-negative-no-cry branch August 16, 2024 19:00
@pllim
Copy link
Contributor Author

pllim commented Aug 16, 2024

Thanks for the reviews!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cubeviz imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations Ready for final review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants