forked from ldecicco-USGS/GLPF_manuscript
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathDiscussion outline.txt
43 lines (33 loc) · 2.23 KB
/
Discussion outline.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Discussion outline
Occurrence and concentrations of HIB and FIB and implications
HIB
-magnitude at diff sites and scales
-evidence for indicator of sewage from this study
-relation to human viruses
-call out the problems with using viruses along (lack of presense when not in the population)
-compare to evidence of sewage from previous studies
FIB
-lack of evidence for sewage indicator in current study
-lack of evidence for pathogen indicator in previous studies
-prevalence of use in permits and recreational use: epi studies that indicate increased sickness
-
Regressions
-Site groupings and implications
-Small scale: doesn’t work. Reasons and implications
-Current sensors vs new sensors. Some incremental improvements may be made, but it isn’t likely that large improvements would be achieved. Correlation among many signals.
-HIB regressions for sewage presence, loadings of sewage, use in comparing loadings through watershed to compare magnitude of contributions from different areas of the watershed
-FIB regressions to provide info for the more commonly used indicators. Still useful for general fecal contamination assessment from a composite of many sources. These are more commonly used, much less expensive to monitor
-Limitations:
-These are still surrogates and not actual measures of bacteria.
-watershed-dependent: while some watersheds can be included in common regressions, it requires similar background DOM for it to work
-Doesn't work as well in some watersheds: Could be due to variable DOM sources that confound the signal.
-Regressions were developed based on composite samples. Discrete sampling would need to be done to explore whether optical signals can provide valuable info in short term variability.
-detection level: if contamination is low, it may be difficult to develop meaningful regressions due to background interference and ability to detect HIB.
Implications for optical sensor use
-Current-use sensors may work just fine without development of new sensors
-All of this hinges on a good translation of lab-measured optical properties to the field.
Laura:
Data release:
FIB + Optical + virus for environmental samples
FIB + Optical + virus for QA samples
FIB + Optical for sewage samples