You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I change the implementation of module X but not its interface, it would be nice to not have to recompile all modules (transitively) depending on X. With ocamlopt, this can be achieved using -opaque, which will disable cross-module optimisations (with the obvious tradeoffs). It would be nice to have that option for Malfunction, too.
This would make the compile-test loop faster and more convenient for large projects, where you're usually fiddling with only a small number of modules. It would avoid unnecessarily triggering full rebuilds if you are editing the implementation of a module at the top of the dependency hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I change the implementation of module
X
but not its interface, it would be nice to not have to recompile all modules (transitively) depending onX
. Withocamlopt
, this can be achieved using-opaque
, which will disable cross-module optimisations (with the obvious tradeoffs). It would be nice to have that option for Malfunction, too.This would make the compile-test loop faster and more convenient for large projects, where you're usually fiddling with only a small number of modules. It would avoid unnecessarily triggering full rebuilds if you are editing the implementation of a module at the top of the dependency hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: