Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Read source-dirs from elm.json #109
Read source-dirs from elm.json #109
Changes from 1 commit
9926b68
136b762
26acf92
98b79ca
4b9cb2f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So perhaps here we can now just remove this bit, and instead just
or some such
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh I thought we just make it optional not remove it completely, but maybe removing it is fine as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By optional I mean that the file doesn't have to exist - if it doesn't you get sensible defaults that should work for most projects.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay removed completely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're slightly talk past each other. What I've been proposing is:
Make the existence of
elm-verify-examples.json
file optional. If it is missing, the default place we find elmRoot is in the containing folder. The default for which modules to run is the exposed ones plus Readme.md.This change instead removes the ability to configure the
elmRoot
. I think that's also interesting, although probably to maintain some flexibility, I'd suggest searching containing folders recursively.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optionally: Require exactly one match, failing explicitly if module reference is ambiguous (> 1 matches).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think elm make fails if there are more than one modules with the same name.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.