Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

Bump pulsar version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT #6043

Draft
wants to merge 77 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

streamnativebot
Copy link

This is a PR created by snbot to trigger the check suite in each repository.

Technoboy- and others added 30 commits January 3, 2024 22:02
…pache#21893)

### Motivation

When `managedLedgerInactiveLedgerRolloverTimeSeconds` is set, let's say to `300` (5 minutes), the ledger will also get rolled in the case when no new entries (messages) were added to the ledger. This doesn't make sense.
Empty ledgers are deleted, but having this extra churn is causing extra load on brokers, bookies, and metadata stores (zookeeper).

### Modifications

Skip rolling the ledger if it is empty.
…ic with a suffix-matched regexp due to a mistake of PIP-145 (apache#21885)
…sed address and advertised listeners are configured (apache#21894)

(cherry picked from commit 3158fd3)
Co-authored-by: Chris Bono <onobc@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 176bdea)
…e#21915)

### Motivation
The sequence of events leading to the deadlock when methods from org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedCursorImpl are invoked concurrently is as follows:

1. Thread A calls asyncDelete, which then goes on to internally call internalAsyncMarkDelete. This results in acquiring a lock on pendingMarkDeleteOps through synchronized (pendingMarkDeleteOps).

2. Inside internalAsyncMarkDelete, internalMarkDelete is called which subsequently calls persistPositionToLedger. At the start of persistPositionToLedger, buildIndividualDeletedMessageRanges is invoked, where it tries to acquire a read lock using lock.readLock().lock(). At this point, if the write lock is being held by another thread, Thread A will block waiting for the read lock.

3. Concurrently, Thread B executes skipNonRecoverableLedger which first obtains a write lock using lock.writeLock().lock() and then proceeds to call asyncDelete.

4. At this moment, Thread B already holds the write lock and is attempting to acquire the synchronized lock on pendingMarkDeleteOps that Thread A already holds, while Thread A is waiting for the read lock that Thread B needs to release.

In code, the deadlock appears as follows:

Thread A: synchronized (pendingMarkDeleteOps) -> lock.readLock().lock() (waiting)
Thread B: lock.writeLock().lock() -> synchronized (pendingMarkDeleteOps) (waiting)

### Modifications

Avoid using a long-range lock.

Co-authored-by: ruihongzhou <ruihongzhou@tencent.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiwe Guo <technoboy@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Lari Hotari <lhotari@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Liu <nodeces@gmail.com>
…eportUnannotatedMethods validation (apache#21976)

(cherry picked from commit 67354b1)
…#21947)

### Motivation

**Steps to reproduce the issue**
- Enable replication.
- Send `10` messages to the local cluster then close the producer.
- Call `pulsar-admin topics unload <topic>` and get an error due to the internal producer of the replicator close failing. 
- The topic closed failed, so we assumed the topic could work as expected, but the replication stopped.

**Root cause**
- `pulsar-admin topics unload <topic>`  will wait for the clients(including `consumers & producers & replicators`) to close successfully, and it will fail if clients can not be closed successfully.
- `replicator.producer` close failed causing the Admin API to fail, but there is a scheduled task that will retry to close `replicator.producer` which causes replication to stop. see https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractReplicator.java#L209

### Modifications

since the "replicator.producer.closeAsync()" will retry after it fails, the topic unload should be successful.
lhotari and others added 30 commits February 21, 2024 10:12
…rect zip/bytecode access (apache#22122)

(cherry picked from commit bbc6224)

# Conflicts:
#	pulsar-functions/worker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/functions/worker/PulsarWorkerService.java
#	tests/integration/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/tests/integration/topologies/PulsarCluster.java
… in expiryMon… (apache#21991)

Co-authored-by: atomchchen <atomchchen@tencent.com>
… exist and do not expect to create a new one. apache#21995 (apache#22004)

Co-authored-by: Jiwe Guo <technoboy@apache.org>
…-io/solr (apache#22047)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7a90426)
…n threshold explicitly, improve getOwnerAsync, and fix other bugs (apache#22064) (apache#22160)
…pon Assigning and Releasing and handle role change during role init (apache#22112)

(cherry picked from commit 56eb758)
### Motivation
1. Change to None state before invoking the recovery.
2. Improve the method `checkTopicTransactionBufferState` to see the test result easier. 
```
org.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException: Condition with org.apache.pulsar.broker.transaction.buffer.TransactionStablePositionTest was not fulfilled within 10 seconds.

	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter.await(ConditionAwaiter.java:167)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:78)
	at org.awaitility.core.CallableCondition.await(CallableCondition.java:26)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:985)
	at org.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:954)
	at org.apache.pulsar.broker.transaction.buffer.TransactionStablePositionTest.checkTopicTransactionBufferState(TransactionStablePositionTest.java:239)
	at org.apache.pulsar.broker.transaction.buffer.TransactionStablePositionTest.testSyncNormalPositionWhenTBRecover(TransactionStablePositionTest.java:229)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:139)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestInvoker.invokeMethod(TestInvoker.java:677)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestInvoker.invokeTestMethod(TestInvoker.java:221)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.MethodRunner.runInSequence(MethodRunner.java:50)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestInvoker$MethodInvocationAgent.invoke(TestInvoker.java:969)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestInvoker.invokeTestMethods(TestInvoker.java:194)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:148)
	at org.testng.internal.invokers.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:128)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:829)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:602)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:437)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:431)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:391)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:330)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:52)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:95)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1256)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1176)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuites(TestNG.java:1099)
	at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1067)
	at com.intellij.rt.testng.IDEARemoteTestNG.run(IDEARemoteTestNG.java:65)
	at com.intellij.rt.testng.RemoteTestNGStarter.main(RemoteTestNGStarter.java:105)

```
### Modifications
1. Change to None state before invoking the recovery.
2. Improve the method `checkTopicTransactionBufferState` to see the test result easier.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.