Remove "try another way" link #127
Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
|
Hello @emmarichardson, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Currently, I am just hiding the link with CSS but having issues with caching to get that to pull the correct css without disabling caching altogether! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ok, I need to check if there is another way to hide the link, but I am afraid there is not. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I feel like there is something wrong though. Ideally I should be able to make the IDP discovery required (which would hide the link) but it is not correctly forwarding to a password form when I do that - is that a bug or do I have it set up wrong?
…On Dec 22, 2022, 7:19 AM -0700, Sven-Torben Janus ***@***.***>, wrote:
Ok, I need to check if there is another way to hide the link, but I am afraid there is not.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's not possible to do so. If you offer a password form as an alternative way to login, then you obviously have two alternatives 1) discovery and 2) username/password. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was just thinking that IDP discovery should include the password form as the “ELSE” variant...
…On Dec 22, 2022, 7:26 AM -0700, Sven-Torben Janus ***@***.***>, wrote:
It's not possible to do so. If you offer a password form as an alternative way to login, then you obviously have two alternatives 1) discovery and 2) username/password.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
How would that be different from what you have right now? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You would only need the IDP option and would not need to add the password form because it would already be part of the IDP option. Not a huge deal, hopefully I can figure out the caching issues and the css link hide will work.
…On Dec 22, 2022, 7:50 AM -0700, Sven-Torben Janus ***@***.***>, wrote:
How would that be different from what you have right now?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
But then you would always have a password form and are unable to configure flows that want passwordless logins. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been trying to set this up and am probably just setting it wrong. I need to redirect one domain to Google and the rest of the users to just normal username/password login. I have it working as I need by using your example set up but because I have the IDP as an alternative, I get the Try Another Way link. If I make IDP required, the non-Google users cannot login because they do not get the password entry page...would appreciate any assistance you can give me...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions