You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @nikhil-001mehta ,
I'm glad to see the new useful features you've added and the nice work that are you doing.
So today I'm here to suggest a new feature.
Is it possible to "connect/correlating" the two calendar? Let me explain it better:
in the first calendar, we have January and in the second February.
If the user selects the next month, both calendars update, so the first has February, and the second has March.
If the user selects the previous month, both calendars update, so the first has December, and the second has January.
I can choose the start date and the end date on the same calendar.
Do you think that this is a possible implementable option? Maybe the logic you've used on your datePicker is not "compatible" with this scenario? Or maybe my suggestion is completely out of scope?
Let me know what you thinks.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@MFava91 Thanks a lot. I am glad that my work is helping to reduce your efforts.
regarding your suggestions, Yes that can be done. Will have to look how much efforts it will take.
It is can be done easily I guess I will give it a try.
Wonderfull!!! Let me know if/when you look at it.
Also, in the next few weeks, I have some free time after work so I can take a look at the code and help if you need.
So, keep me up to date and good work.
Hi @nikhil-001mehta ,
I'm glad to see the new useful features you've added and the nice work that are you doing.
So today I'm here to suggest a new feature.
Is it possible to "connect/correlating" the two calendar? Let me explain it better:
I give you a working example to make you understand better what I mean -> http://airbnb.io/react-dates
Do you think that this is a possible implementable option? Maybe the logic you've used on your datePicker is not "compatible" with this scenario? Or maybe my suggestion is completely out of scope?
Let me know what you thinks.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: