Failed to load multiple resources

[Tamnac]

Running the extension with the instructions described here: https://github.com/thetarnav/solid-devtools/tree/main/extension

The tab does come up. It seems a little barebones, but I've never used it so not sure what to expect. However in the console I get 404's

I don't know what's supposed to be in those files.

Solid: 1.94
devtools: 0.33

Running on vivaldi/chromium 130, windows 11

[thetarnav]

Does the same happen here? https://stackblitz.com/edit/solid-devtools-demo (you have to open the preview in a new tab to use the extension)

Does anything show up when you click on the extension icon?

I assume that the files from the screenshot are missing in the sources tab?

[Tamnac]

This is what I get on that page, not sure if it's related.

The extension popup works normally, both for the demo and my machine

Tested in both edge and vivaldi

[thetarnav]

Does it works on chrome or firefox?
I only actually test on chrome, firefox and brave. Both edge and vivaldi are chromium though.

[stevenalanstark]

I'm running into this aswell, same issue exactly

when debugging the error, I see that the link is being requested from the running vite dev server because it starts with / : /assets/index-CRpvccQ5.js and the URL that is failing includes the dev server port: http://localhost:5173/assets/index-CRpvccQ5.js

the vite dev server is not serving these files, and I don't expect it should be. correct?

also: yes, the demo link has the same errors. Actually, there are more errors there, but also the same ones.

Chrome Version 131.0.6778.205 (Official Build) (arm64)

update: I had a random ' in my js src, and after removing that I do see the solid tab now, but the errors remain. The errors don't seem to effect much, it will still run. I also updated chrome, so this may of helped.

I'm now at Version 132.0.6834.84 (Official Build) (arm64)

[Tamnac]

I assume that the files from the screenshot are missing in the sources tab?

Oh yeah, the files are actually all there in the sources tab. Furthermore, upon checking the network tab, it seems there is both a successful and unsuccessful request for each, sometimes the successful first and sometimes after.

@stevenalanstark lmk if you are seeing the same thing