Skip to content

Upgrade to support pydantic 2.0+ #100

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for the patience with my reply! 😅

This would be a feature request.

I deprecated this library a while ago in favor of SQLModel which would solve all the same use cases in a much better way, and I'm directing all the effort in that direction.

SQLModel uses Pydantic models to define both data and table (SQL) models, so it's easier to do all these things. 🚀

Also, this library only supports SQLAlchemy 1.4.x, not 2.x. 🫠

Replies: 10 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by tiangolo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
10 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #56 on September 08, 2024 15:01.