-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional check functions #86
Open
topepo
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
additional-check-functions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
79fad2c
bring in rlang files
044e049
three new checker functions
62d71f9
tests
32a937a
temp comment out function with conflicting name
87c39ca
document
a2db55b
no namespace needed
692ffae
no namespace needed
cb3fc21
Apply suggestions from code review
topepo da13c05
check_single_logical <- check_bool
topepo 4fa6781
Apply suggestions from code review
topepo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@ | ||
# Additional type checkers designed for testing argument values. | ||
|
||
check_number_whole_vec <- function(x, call = rlang::caller_env(), arg = rlang::caller_arg(x), ...) { | ||
|
||
for (i in x) { | ||
check_number_whole(i, arg = arg, call = call, ...) | ||
} | ||
x <- as.integer(x) | ||
topepo marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
invisible(x) | ||
} | ||
|
||
check_number_decimal_vec <- function(x, call = rlang::caller_env(), ...) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same edits to this function. |
||
cl <- match.call() | ||
arg <- as.character(cl$x) | ||
topepo marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
for (i in x) { | ||
check_number_decimal(i, arg = arg, call = call, ...) | ||
} | ||
invisible(x) | ||
} | ||
|
||
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
# soon to be replaced checkers | ||
|
||
|
||
check_missing_data <- function(x, y, fn = "some function", verbose = FALSE) { | ||
compl_data <- complete.cases(x, y) | ||
if (any(!compl_data)) { | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The downside here is that we only catch one violation at a time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would imagine there's a pretty steep performance penalty here, too. This is the same kind of performance issue that led to tidymodels/parsnip#835.
Maybe an error could be conditional on
rlang::is_integerish()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it steep for checking arguments (not data)? We need some sort of (short length) numeric vector checks with min/max/na/null options.