You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running into a strange occurrence where a reconciled arima model with exogenous regressors produces an unexplained set of results, where all of the reconciled estimates are far above the baseline models (in the absence of the aggregate_key / reconciliation) by a factor of 20% or more.
In the below example, I would expect that the no hierarchy/aggregation models would line up with the arima_base as well as the top_down lining up with the non-aggregated (aggregate). However, they seem to produce much different results. Below I am using a dummy regressor that's intended to be the same value across all series.
I apologize in advance for the verbosity, but currently I am unable to pinpoint exactly where the differences come from.
The only related issue that I could find is #373 though it does seem to be slightly different in nature.
One of my colleagues pointed out that another interesting finding is that these results differ when we modify the above to use forecast vs. fitted though we are unsure of why as they are both based on in sample data.
But if we model in log/log then we see similar results between forecast and fitted
Running into a strange occurrence where a reconciled arima model with exogenous regressors produces an unexplained set of results, where all of the reconciled estimates are far above the baseline models (in the absence of the
aggregate_key
/ reconciliation) by a factor of 20% or more.In the below example, I would expect that the no hierarchy/aggregation models would line up with the arima_base as well as the top_down lining up with the non-aggregated (aggregate). However, they seem to produce much different results. Below I am using a dummy regressor that's intended to be the same value across all series.
I apologize in advance for the verbosity, but currently I am unable to pinpoint exactly where the differences come from.
The only related issue that I could find is #373 though it does seem to be slightly different in nature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: