Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create new function check_compatibility #95

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ehwenk
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehwenk ehwenk commented Sep 4, 2024

Add new function to check if the data object being used with austraits functions is compatible, explicitly checking if it has been built using traits.build (vs older AusTraits versions that were built by the internal austraits.build workflow).

Includes simple tests.

Towards issue #93

create new function to check is data object compatible with austraits 3.0 functions
add documentation, fix typo
update readme to indicate how to source older versions of austraits
add messaging, change how T/F is stored... but I'm not sure how to avoid the value of "compatible" being shown
Add utils function to convert a list of lists to a dataframe
tentative test for check_compatibility
NAMESPACE Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/utils.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/utils.R Show resolved Hide resolved
README.Rmd Show resolved Hide resolved
R/check_compatibility.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@fontikar fontikar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing effort, excited to build on this!! Thanks for figuring out a generalised example for the util_list_to_df2 function! Some minor changes requested

@ehwenk ehwenk merged commit 6928738 into develop Sep 4, 2024
3 checks passed
@ehwenk ehwenk deleted the check_compatibility branch September 4, 2024 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants