You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In many studies there are "filled characters" used to represent NA. Currently these have to be converted to NA's in the custom_R_code using `~ na_if(.x, "character").
This function has gotten fussier with dplyr 1.1.0, no longer allowing mass substitutions across a mix of character and numeric columns. It might be better to specify within the metadata.yml file specific characters that are NA's for a given study.
This would be included as another optional field in metadata$dataset, probably appearing right before the custom_R_code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
arising from traitecoevo/austraits.build#675 via @ehwenk
In many studies there are "filled characters" used to represent NA. Currently these have to be converted to NA's in the
custom_R_code
using `~ na_if(.x, "character").This function has gotten fussier with dplyr 1.1.0, no longer allowing mass substitutions across a mix of character and numeric columns. It might be better to specify within the
metadata.yml
file specific characters that are NA's for a given study.This would be included as another optional field in metadata$dataset, probably appearing right before the
custom_R_code
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: