You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How should implementers interpret this? Is this something that is only planned for a future revision of KERI?
Should the implementers targeting compatibility with the current vLEI ecosystem refer to the keripy for the authoritative answers then?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
VasiliyS
changed the title
Does drt really has a c field?
Do drt and 'rot' really have a c field?
Aug 9, 2024
VasiliyS
changed the title
Do drt and 'rot' really have a c field?
Do drt and rot really have a c field?
Aug 9, 2024
The 'c' field was added for KERI version 2 for both the "rot" and "drt" messages. The specs as written are forward looking for the next version version 2 not version 1. Version 1 is the production code.
If you look more closely however you will see that one can generate version 2 key event messages that include all the version 2 fields. The Fields class variable in the Serder class in keri.core.serdering.py includes the field names for Vrsn_2_0 and you can see that both the 'rot" and "drt" messages include a 'c' field.
https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-keri-specification/#delegated-rotation-event-message-body
defines the following fields:
[ v, t, d, i, s, p, kt, k, nt, n, bt, br, ba, c, a]
.However,
keripy
's implementation lacks any references to it. The same goes for therot
message.according to: https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-keri-specification/#configuration-traits-field, this could potentially hold
RB
trait (Registrar Backers).How should implementers interpret this? Is this something that is only planned for a future revision of KERI?
Should the implementers targeting compatibility with the current vLEI ecosystem refer to the
keripy
for the authoritative answers then?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: