You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In various places in tsinfer we try to work out if a site contains missing data, and if so, we append a None to the alleles list, so that if we access into the list, we get a None out.
Sorting out the logic of whether a site has missing data leads to some extra complex code. Why don;t we simply add a None to all allele lists, so that the number of alleles is always the size of the list minus 1? What are the downsides to that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In various places in tsinfer we try to work out if a site contains missing data, and if so, we append a None to the alleles list, so that if we access into the list, we get a
None
out.Sorting out the logic of whether a site has missing data leads to some extra complex code. Why don;t we simply add a
None
to all allele lists, so that the number of alleles is always the size of the list minus 1? What are the downsides to that?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: