-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document rf_distance() #3032
Document rf_distance() #3032
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks @hyanwong
Can you add rf_distance to the CHANGELOG while you're here? Crediting Ao |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3032 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.07% 87.07%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 24666 24666
Branches 4556 4556
=======================================
Hits 21478 21478
Misses 1824 1824
Partials 1364 1364
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Changelog added. Let's get this baby shipped @benjeffery ! |
@Mergifyio rebase |
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
In the first commit in the PR, I have moved all the
kc_distance
testing fromtest_topology.py
into the newtest_distance_metrics.py
file, created by @Billyzhang1229 for the rf tests. This seems more logical, and usefully slims down the hugetest_topology.py
file. At some point we might want to rationalise that file though, as thekc_
testing and therf_
testing take rather different approaches.