Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC007] Bytecode interpreter #2045

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[RFC007] Bytecode interpreter #2045

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

yannham
Copy link
Member

@yannham yannham commented Sep 17, 2024

Although the name is a bit pompous, the goal of this RFC is mostly to be a working document for designing a more compact and efficient run-time representation for Nickel expressions.

While this is something that won't be user-facing (at least in a direct way), and thus can be changed later without breaking backward-compatibility, I think the technical scope of this effort is such that I find it better to discuss it formally here before going for a first implementation.

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 17, 2024 15:08 Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2045/merge
Testbedubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: The following Measure does not have a Threshold. Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated!

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencynanoseconds (ns)
fibonacci 10📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
495,240.00
pidigits 100📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
3,226,100.00
product 30📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
842,450.00
scalar 10📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
1,525,800.00
sum 30📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
837,450.00
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 19, 2024 16:26 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 20, 2024 14:58 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 23, 2024 08:32 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 23, 2024 10:47 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 23, 2024 16:39 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 25, 2024 12:38 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 25, 2024 16:07 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request September 30, 2024 14:33 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant