Documentation standards #1808
7596ff
started this conversation in
Development & RFCs
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Some things came up in #1792, which should be discussed further. Please feel free to add more suggestions and opinions, project-wide.
Redundant associated type link
twilight/model/src/channel/message/mod.rs
Lines 118 to 120 in 94c8e00
I don't think we should link to a type if it is already linked in the field itself.
Associated type ID link
twilight/model/src/channel/message/mod.rs
Lines 121 to 125 in 94c8e00
I'm not sure if we should link to the type an ID eventually, logically points to, I think decisions should be made on a case by case basis but I'm not sure what the criteria are.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions