We'd love to get patches from you!
Stitch is built using sbt. When building please use the included
./sbt
script which
provides a thin wrapper over sbt and correctly sets memory and other
settings.
If you have any questions or run into any problems, please create an issue here on GitHub.
We follow the GitHub Flow Workflow
- Fork stitch
- Check out the
develop
branch - Create a feature branch
- Write code and tests for your change
- From your branch, make a pull request against
twitter/stitch/develop
- Work with repo maintainers to get your change reviewed
- Wait for your change to be pulled into
twitter/stitch/develop
- Delete your feature branch
There are a number of things we like to see in pull requests. Depending on the scope of your change, there may not be many to take care of, but please scan this list and see which apply. It's okay if something is missed; the maintainers will help out during code review.
- Include tests.
- Update the changelog for new features, API breakages, runtime behavior changes, deprecations, and bug fixes.
- All public APIs should have Scaladoc.
- When adding a constructor to an existing class or arguments to an existing method, in order to preserve backwards compatibility for Java users, avoid Scala's default arguments. Instead use explicit forwarding methods.
- The second argument of an
@deprecated
annotation should be the current date, inYYYY-MM-DD
form.
We've standardized on using the ScalaTest testing framework.
Because ScalaTest has such a big surface area, we use a restricted subset of it
in our tests to keep them easy to read. We've chosen the Matchers
API, and we
use the FunSuite
mixin. Please extend our Test suite
to get these defaults.
Note that while you will see a Travis CI status message in your pull request, all changes will also be tested internally at X before being merged.
When appropriate, use ScalaCheck to write property-based tests for your code. This will often produce more thorough and effective inputs for your tests. We use ScalaTest's GeneratorDrivenPropertyChecks as the entry point for writing these tests.
We try to keep public APIs stable for the obvious reasons. Often, compatibility can be kept by adding a forwarding method. Note that we avoid adding default arguments because this is not a compatible change for our Java users. However, when the benefits outweigh the costs, we are willing to break APIs. The break should be noted in the Breaking API Changes section of the changelog. Note that changes to non-public APIs will not be called out in the changelog.
While the project is written in Scala, its public APIs should be usable from
Java. This occasionally works out naturally from the Scala interop, but more
often than not, if care is not taken Java users will have rough corners
(e.g. SomeCompanion$.MODULE$.someMethod()
or a symbolic operator).
We take a variety of approaches to minimize this.
- Add a "compilation" unit test, written in Java, that verifies the APIs are usable from Java.
- If there is anything gnarly, we add Java adapters either by adding a non-symbolic method name or by adding a class that does forwarding.
- Prefer
abstract
classes overtraits
as they are easier for Java developers to extend.
We generally follow the Scala Style Guide. When in doubt, look around the codebase and see how it's done elsewhere.
When creating an issue please try to adhere to the following format:
module-name: One line summary of the issue (less than 72 characters)
### Expected behavior
As concisely as possible, describe the expected behavior.
### Actual behavior
As concisely as possible, describe the observed behavior.
### Steps to reproduce the behavior
List all relevant steps to reproduce the observed behavior.
Comments should be formatted to a width no greater than 80 columns.
Files should be exempt of trailing spaces.
We adhere to a specific format for commit messages. Please write your commit
messages along these guidelines. Please keep the line width no greater than 80
columns (You can use fmt -n -p -w 80
to accomplish this).
module-name: One line description of your change (less than 72 characters)
Problem
Explain the context and why you're making that change. What is the problem
you're trying to solve? In some cases there is not a problem and this can be
thought of being the motivation for your change.
Solution
Describe the modifications you've done.
Result
What will change as a result of your pull request? Note that sometimes this
section is unnecessary because it is self-explanatory based on the solution.
Some important notes regarding the summary line:
- Describe what was done; not the result
- Use the active voice
- Use the present tense
- Capitalize properly
- Do not end in a period — this is a title/subject
- Prefix the subject with its scope (stitch-http, stitch-jackson, stitch-*)
The Stitch repository on GitHub is kept in sync with an internal repository at X. For the most part this process should be transparent to Stitch users, but it does have some implications for how pull requests are merged into the codebase.
When you submit a pull request on GitHub, it will be reviewed by the Stitch community (both inside and outside of X), and once the changes are approved, your commits will be brought into X's internal system for additional testing. Once the changes are merged internally, they will be pushed back to GitHub with the next sync.
This process means that the pull request will not be merged in the usual way. Instead a member of the Stitch team will post a message in the pull request thread when your changes have made their way back to GitHub, and the pull request will be closed (see this pull request in Finatra for an example). The changes in the pull request will be collapsed into a single commit, but the authorship metadata will be preserved.
We also welcome improvements to the Stitch documentation or to the existing Scaladocs. Please file an issue.
By contributing your code, you agree to license your contribution under the terms of the Apache 2.0 License: https://github.com/twitter/stitch/blob/master/LICENSE