Costmap #639
Merged
Costmap #639
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ber changes in context
ankithu
reviewed
Mar 24, 2024
ankithu
reviewed
Mar 24, 2024
ankithu
reviewed
Mar 24, 2024
ankithu
reviewed
Mar 24, 2024
ankithu
reviewed
Mar 24, 2024
qhdwight
reviewed
Mar 29, 2024
urdf/meshes/ground1.fbx
Outdated
qhdwight
force-pushed
the
integration
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8e721f6
to
65c9dc9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #610
Added costmap (occupancy grid) in the map frame filled based on point cloud normals.
Did you add documentation to the wiki?
No because not finished
How was this code tested?
The costmap generation was tested in the sim:
Here, black represents low cost, dark grey represents high cost, and light grey represents cells for which data hasn't been collected yet.
Here is the corresponding terrain:
Did you test this in sim?
Yes
Did you test this on the rover?
No
Did you add unit tests?
No