Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QE: Fix wrong repo in reference products sync #7485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2023

Conversation

nodeg
Copy link
Member

@nodeg nodeg commented Aug 31, 2023

What does this PR change?

See https://ci.suse.de/view/Manager/view/Uyuni/job/uyuni-master-infra-reference-NUE/754
There is no channel named sle-product-sles15-sp4-pool-x86_64 available via spacewalk-common-channels. Furthermore, we do not sync SLES in Uyuni anymore.

image
uyuni-refmaster-srv:~ # spacewalk-common-channels -l | grep sles15
 sles15-sap-sp2-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp2-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp3-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp3-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp4-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp4-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp5-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sap-sp5-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp1-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp1-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp2-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp2-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp3-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp3-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp4-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp4-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp5-devel-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-sp5-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-uyuni-client: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
 sles15-uyuni-client-devel: x86_64, s390x, aarch64, ppc64le
uyuni-refmaster-srv:~ #

GUI diff

No difference.

  • DONE

Documentation

  • No documentation needed: only internal and user invisible changes

  • DONE

Test coverage

  • Cucumber tests were added

  • DONE

Links

  • Manager 4.3:
  • DONE

Changelogs

Make sure the changelogs entries you are adding are compliant with https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#changelogs and https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#uyuni-projectuyuni-repository

If you don't need a changelog check, please mark this checkbox:

  • No changelog needed

If you uncheck the checkbox after the PR is created, you will need to re-run changelog_test (see below)

Re-run a test

If you need to re-run a test, please mark the related checkbox, it will be unchecked automatically once it has re-run:

  • Re-run test "changelog_test"
  • Re-run test "backend_unittests_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "java_pgsql_tests"
  • Re-run test "schema_migration_test_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "susemanager_unittests"
  • Re-run test "javascript_lint"
  • Re-run test "spacecmd_unittests"

@nodeg nodeg self-assigned this Aug 31, 2023
@nodeg nodeg marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2023 13:43
@nodeg nodeg requested a review from a team as a code owner August 31, 2023 13:43
There is no channel named `sle-product-sles15-sp4-pool-x86_64 `
available via `spacewalk-common-channels
@jordimassaguerpla
Copy link
Contributor

These tests should be skipped when running as gh actions because we do not sync any channel at all. Please use the tag ' @skip_if_github_validation'

@nodeg
Copy link
Member Author

nodeg commented Aug 31, 2023

@jordimassaguerpla I did not find those files included in any of the .yaml files for the GitHub Actions. I wonder if the tag is necessary?
image

@jordimassaguerpla
Copy link
Contributor

@jordimassaguerpla I did not find those files included in any of the .yaml files for the GitHub Actions. I wonder if the tag is necessary? image

I did not realized they were not included. Then, the tags are not needed. LGTM

@nodeg
Copy link
Member Author

nodeg commented Aug 31, 2023

The one failed test is the usual flaky uptime test.
image

@nodeg nodeg merged commit 711a33f into uyuni-project:master Aug 31, 2023
8 of 9 checks passed
@nodeg nodeg deleted the qe-fix-reference-sync branch August 31, 2023 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants