You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The columns in this fees table are not labelled in line with industry norms, and it's not clear that three of the columns are a breakdown of another column rather than separate fees:
Labels should be updated as follows:
Total fee after discount → Taker fee after discount Total fee before discount → Taker fee before discount
We need to make the fee components much more clearly a breakdown of the fee before discount, perhaps we can use larger fonts for the two total fees and a more muted colour for the fee components. If there was a way to make this hierarchy/breakdown even more clear, or even to hide the breakdown initially, that'd be good.
It would also be worth adding a maker rebate column which would need to show a range from the lowest (with maxed out discounts) to the highest (the maker fee component amount) rebate that a maker woudl receive.
This table needs to be redesigned when the new fee components in vegaprotocol/specs#2295 and the dynamic maker fee landhttps://github.com/vegaprotocol/specs/issues/2296 land, but the above should be good for now.
Acceptance Criteria
Change Total fee after discount → Taker fee after discount and pin it to the far left
Change Total fee before discount → Taker fee before discount and move it to be the second column
Other columns are unchanged to the right
Do something to emphasise those first two columns or de-emphasize the last three (brightness / size)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Personally I do not see this issue as high impact enough to justify doing it ahead of the fee mechanics changes. Can we consider this as part of those changes and redesign the page as part of that process?
The columns in this fees table are not labelled in line with industry norms, and it's not clear that three of the columns are a breakdown of another column rather than separate fees:
Labels should be updated as follows:
Total fee after discount
→Taker fee after discount
Total fee before discount
→Taker fee before discount
We need to make the fee components much more clearly a breakdown of the fee before discount, perhaps we can use larger fonts for the two total fees and a more muted colour for the fee components. If there was a way to make this hierarchy/breakdown even more clear, or even to hide the breakdown initially, that'd be good.
It would also be worth adding a maker rebate column which would need to show a range from the lowest (with maxed out discounts) to the highest (the maker fee component amount) rebate that a maker woudl receive.
This table needs to be redesigned when the new fee components in vegaprotocol/specs#2295 and the dynamic maker fee landhttps://github.com/vegaprotocol/specs/issues/2296 land, but the above should be good for now.
Acceptance Criteria
Total fee after discount
→Taker fee after discount
and pin it to the far leftTotal fee before discount
→Taker fee before discount
and move it to be the second columnThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: