This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Fixes #303 #311
Open
dweemx
wants to merge
2
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
bugfix/303-single_sample_scrublet_missing_clusterings
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Fixes #303 #311
dweemx
wants to merge
2
commits into
develop
from
bugfix/303-single_sample_scrublet_missing_clusterings
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
KrisDavie
reviewed
Feb 16, 2021
Comment on lines
+477
to
+515
process MAKE_UNIQUE_FILENAME { | ||
|
||
label 'compute_resources__minimal' | ||
|
||
input: | ||
tuple \ | ||
val(tag), \ | ||
path(f), \ | ||
val(stashedParams) | ||
val(fileOutputSuffix) | ||
val(toolName) | ||
val(isParameterExplorationModeOn) | ||
|
||
output: | ||
tuple \ | ||
val(tag), \ | ||
path(outputFileName), \ | ||
val(stashedParams) | ||
|
||
script: | ||
outputFileName = getOutputFileName( | ||
params, | ||
tag, | ||
f, | ||
fileOutputSuffix, | ||
isParameterExplorationModeOn, | ||
stashedParams | ||
) | ||
/* avoid cases where the input and output files have identical names: | ||
Move the input file to a unique name, then create a link to | ||
the input file */ | ||
""" | ||
mv $f tmp | ||
if [ ! -f ${outputFileName} ]; then | ||
ln -L tmp "${outputFileName}" | ||
fi | ||
""" | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't we discuss using the stageAs
option from nextflow for this kind of issue? It seems redundant to use a link and all the moving when nextflow is able to do this. I know that some functions use the name of the original file to determine some information, but then it seems that maybe this could just be passed as an argument to those processes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So you would remove this NXF process and use stageAs
in the process where the output should be groupTuble
d ?
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.