WWS workload with containerd shim taking more CPU as compared to other Wasm workloads #258
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
Thank you for creating this discussion @divya-mohan0209! I think is worth taking a look at what is going on. Are you good if I upload the images here that were uploaded to Zulip? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@ereslibre : I am sorry I just saw this now 😄 I uploaded the images & have provided more context in the next comment! wws workload when idle: 
spin workload when idle: 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Setup context:
If you'd like to replicate the setup, you can check out the demo repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is per the discussion on the Bytecode Alliance Zulip regarding Wasm workers server workloads taking way more memory (~38%) as compared to other Wasm workloads from the same example.
To do:
Provide more context about setupProvide screencaps from the BA Zulip here, as well.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions