Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Exporting/Backing up OVF vAPP properties of Validated Solutions VMs. #591

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
stanmladenov opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #592
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

Enhance Exporting/Backing up OVF vAPP properties of Validated Solutions VMs. #591

stanmladenov opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #592
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Enhancement size/s Relative Sizing: small under-review Under Review vvs/pdr Site Protection and Disaster Recovery
Milestone

Comments

@stanmladenov
Copy link

Code of Conduct

  • I have read and agree to the project's Code of Conduct.
  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue initial description to help the maintainers prioritize.
  • Do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant information or questions.
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.

Description

Related to Back up OVF Properties of Protected Virtual Machines in the Protected VMware Cloud Foundation Instance Guide -

Command Backup-VMOVFProperties -server $sddcManagerFqdn -user $sddcManagerUser -pass $sddcManagerPass fails in case any of the Aria components is not installed/missing( vRSLCM, WSA, vROPS, vRA ).

Looking at the source, script seems to be looking for all Aria components' VMs and if it does not find anyone of them, process fails.

OVFexport_error.

It would be really useful to adjust mentioned function so that it skips missing Aria components and does the job for anything that exists.

Use Case(s)

With this enhancement applied, it would be possible to extract OFV vApp properties without the need of having all Aria Suite deployed.

Potential Configuration

~

References

No response

@stanmladenov stanmladenov added enhancement Enhancement needs-review Needs Review labels Apr 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pending-review Pending Review label Apr 23, 2024
@GaryJBlake GaryJBlake added this to the v2.10.0 milestone Apr 23, 2024
@GaryJBlake GaryJBlake added under-review Under Review size/s Relative Sizing: small vvs/pdr Site Protection and Disaster Recovery and removed pending-review Pending Review needs-review Needs Review labels Apr 23, 2024
@GaryJBlake GaryJBlake self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Enhancement size/s Relative Sizing: small under-review Under Review vvs/pdr Site Protection and Disaster Recovery
Projects
None yet
2 participants