Document what to do if the council gets stuck on procedural questions (…

…#244)

See also w3c/process#909 and
w3c/process#843

council/council.html

@@ -240,6 +240,18 @@ <h2 id="referral"><a href="#referral">Referral to W3C Council</a></h2>
         do so if they wish. They may consult with deciders and objectors if they wish. See thoroughness and fairness below.</p></li>
       <li><p>Once consultations are completed, the Chair of the W3C Council assesses the consensus of the Council, or if consensus cannot be found,
         calls for a vote of the W3C Council to sustain or overrule the Formal Objection.</p></li>
+      <li><p>If there is disagreement within the Council
+            about the meaning of those sections of the Process
+            that govern the Council itself
+            in a way that interferes with its ability to discuss the substance of the case,
+            the Chair should try to resolve this by consensus,
+            and should seek the advice from the Team contact on how to interpret the Process.
+            If consensus cannot be found,
+            the chair should make a determination,
+            possibly through a vote,
+            to allow the deliberations to move on.
+            Any such point of procedural contention should be covered
+            in the Council Report.</p></li>
       <li><p>The W3C Council <a href="/policies/process/#council-decision">publishes its decision and its rationale</a>.</p></li>
       <li><p>Whether the decision is to sustain or overrule, the W3C Council may include additional guidance for any of the participants involved.</p></li>
       <li><p>If the objection is sustained, the relevant group (i.e., Working Group, or Team developing a charter) may resume work to develop a different proposal for their document.</p></li>