Remove nonsensical test in AES-CBC export key operation #375
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
twiss
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
|
And indeed, could you mark the change as non-substantive in https://labs.w3.org/repo-manager/pr/id/w3c/webcrypto/375? |
|
BenWiederhake marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg. |
|
Done. Also, there seems to be a cute UI glitch in that website: |
|
Thanks! |
github-actions bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
SHA: d68a54a Reason: push, by twiss Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #374
Since this is a pure spec bug (I believe), there is no need to track issues in implementations.
EDIT: I guess the easiest way to move forward is to mark this change as non-substantive? I'm unsure, please clarify.