Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC2119 changes #393

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 20 additions & 6 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@
should restrict the [=data=] they transfer to what's either necessary to achieve their users'
goals or aligns with their users' wishes and interests.</span></div>

<div class="practice" data-audiences="api-designers"><span class="practicelab">Web APIs should be designed to minimize the amount of data that sites need
<div class="practice" data-audiences="api-designers"><span class="practicelab">Web APIs must be designed to minimize the amount of data that sites need
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one has tradeoffs: letting callers minimize the data increases the size of the API ... so I think it should remain "should".

jyasskin marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
to request to carry out their users' goals.
Web APIs should also provide granularity and user controls over <a>personal
data</a> that is communicated to sites.</span></div>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@
## Information access {#information}

<div class="practice" data-audiences="api-designers user-agents">
<span class="practicelab">New web APIs must guard users' information at least
<span class="practicelab">New web APIs should guard users' information at least
as well as existing APIs that are expected to stay in the web platform.</span>
</div>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@
<div class="practice" data-audiences="websites api-designers">
<span class="practicelab" id="transparency-distinguishable">
Mechanisms that can be used for [=recognize|recognizing=] [=people=] should be designed so that
their operation is visible and distinguishable, to [=user agents=], researchers and regulators.
their operation is visible and distinguishable, to [=user agents=], researchers, and regulators.
</span>
</div>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1919,7 +1919,7 @@
<p>
<span class="practicelab" id="principle-minimize-consent-requests">
An [=actor=] should avoid interrupting a [=person=]'s use of a site for
consent requests when an alternative is available.
consent requests when an alternative is available.
</span>
</p>
</div>
Expand All @@ -1941,8 +1941,8 @@
<div class="practice" data-audiences="websites">
<p>
<span class="practicelab" id="principle-consent-withdraw">
It should be as easy for a [=person=] to check what consent they have given, to withdraw consent,
or to opt out or object, as to give consent.
It should be as easy for a [=person=] to check what consent they have given, to withdraw consent,
or to opt out or object, as to give consent.
</span>
</p>
</div>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2389,6 +2389,20 @@

<section class="appendix" id="bp-summary"></section>

<section class="appendix">

# Conformance

This document does not adhere to strict [[?RFC2129]] terminology because it is primarily of
jyasskin marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
an informative nature and does not easily lend itself to constraining a conformance class.
However, within the formulation of its principles, we have taken care to use "should" to indicate
that a principle can be ignored in some rare cases given that there are valid reasons for doing so and
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we mean "can be ignored", but rather that a principle could be overridden in particular cases where there are valid reasons for doing so

jyasskin marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
"must" to indicate that we can see no situation in which deviating from the principle could
be justified.

</section>


<section class="appendix">

# Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements}
Expand Down