Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate new Jenkins and QA tools to the new QA repository #5557

Closed
6 tasks done
Tracked by #5556 ...
QU3B1M opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Tracked by #5556 ...

Migrate new Jenkins and QA tools to the new QA repository #5557

QU3B1M opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@QU3B1M
Copy link
Member

QU3B1M commented Jul 10, 2024

Main issue
#5556

Description

Migrate the new Jenkins code developed for https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-jenkins/issues/5927 and the new QA tools made on #4495 and on https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-jenkins/issues/6359 to the new wazuh-qa repository respecting the defined structure: #5475 (comment)

Tasks

Important

Once all the tasks' PRs are approved and merged, review and merge the main migrations branch PR: https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-qa-automation/pull/20

@wazuhci wazuhci moved this to Backlog in Release 4.10.0 Jul 10, 2024
@QU3B1M QU3B1M added level/subtask Subtask issue and removed level/task Task issue labels Jul 10, 2024
@QU3B1M QU3B1M changed the title Migrate new Jenkins and QA tools to the new repository Migrate new Jenkins and QA tools to the new QA repository Jul 11, 2024
@damarisg damarisg added level/task Task issue and removed level/subtask Subtask issue labels Jul 23, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Backlog to In progress in Release 4.10.0 Jul 25, 2024
@QU3B1M
Copy link
Member Author

QU3B1M commented Jul 26, 2024

Update report

Last Update: 05/08/2024 - 09:38p.m.

@QU3B1M
Copy link
Member Author

QU3B1M commented Aug 6, 2024

Improvements detected

While working on the migration, some improvements were detected and referenced in this comment.

Release Procedures

Medium priority improvements:

  • tools/release/src/**/docker/Dockerfile_tests: Each module's docker test image.
    We should re-evaluate if it's necessary to run each module's unit tests on a docker image, noting that it consumes time and may not add much value to the development itself.
  • .github/workflows: Main GHA workflows directory
    • Currently, all the Release Procedures modules' Unit Tests are being executed on GHA and running on Docker, which means that we build a Docker image and run it on each GHA, and it is resources-consuming.
    • All the GHA Workflows can be simplified in just one workflows that runs all the UTs (but first, it would be great if we get rid of the Docker build)

Testing

High-priority improvements:

  • tools/testing/src/testing/testing.py: Main testing module file
    • The module's parameters are strongly attached to DTT, it must be more generic to re-use it on different suites.
    • It expects the target and dependencies inventories to be on a specific path with a desired format, so it won't detect the target system correctly if the inventory is in a custom directory.
  • tools/testing/src/testing/playbooks/test.yml Test execution playbook
    The test path is generated "dynamically" but it depends completely on the DTT format
  • tests/test_functional/test_system/test_deployability/workflows: DTT workflows directory
    • The workflows are outdated, and its using the legacy allocator path, it must be updated to use them.
    • Wazuh version on the Workflows is hardcoded using an outdated value.
    • Add parametrization on the Workflows where possible.
  • tools/testing/tests: Testing tool Unit Tests directory
    There are no Unit Tests developed, we must create a set of tests to ensure its correct functionality
    Related issues:

Medium priority improvements:

  • tests/test_functional/test_system/test_deployability/tests: Main DTT tests directory
    The test helpers have a lot of duplicated code, and there are several wrongly handled conditional flows. We could include unit tests for the helpers to validate its correct behavior

JobFlow

Medium priority improvements:

  • tools/jobflow/README.md: Main documentation file of the JobFlow tool
    Currently, the documentation is DTT1-specific, it does not help the user to understand what the tool does, and how it can be used for different cases.

Low priority improvements:

  • tools/jobflow/tests: Unit Tests suite
    This suite uses Python's default test runner UnitTests utilities and pytest as the runner, it could be improved by only using pytest and its utilities, which is recommended.
    Related issues:
  • tools/jobflow/examples: Workflows examples directory
    We must add more Workflows as examples of different use cases.

Other improvements could be found here: #5044


Provision

Medium priority improvements:

  • tools/provision/README.md: Main documentation file of the Provision tool
    This README is strongly related to the JobFlow, it could be improved detailing mainly the standalone execution and having the JobFlow workflow as a secondary use.

Low-priority improvements:

  • tools/provision/src/provision/playbooks/wazuh: Wazuh-related playbooks
    This directory could be re-structured, probably the non install/uninstall actions (register, services, set repo) could be separated on a different folder as these actions are not specifically related to an installation type.
  • tools/provision/tests: Unit Tests suite
    This suite uses Python's default test runner UnitTests utilities and pytest as the runner, it could be improved by only using pytest and its utilities, which is recommended.
    Related issues:

Jenkins

Low-priority improvements:

  • tools/jenkins/tests: tool's Unit Tests directory
    Must implement more Unit Tests for this tool
  • tools/jenkins/src/job-builder: Jenkins pipelines as a code
    Add a README.md detailing this folder, it could be implemented here or in the main Jenkins src directory (tools/jenkins/src), in the second case, it should also includes a summary about bootstrap

@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In progress to Pending review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 6, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending review to In review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 8, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In review to On hold in Release 4.10.0 Aug 9, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from On hold to In progress in Release 4.10.0 Aug 9, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In progress to Pending review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 9, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending review to In review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In review to In progress in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In progress to Pending review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending review to In review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In review to On hold in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from On hold to In progress in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In progress to Pending review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 12, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending review to In review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 13, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In review to On hold in Release 4.10.0 Aug 13, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from On hold to In progress in Release 4.10.0 Aug 13, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from In progress to Pending review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 13, 2024
@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending review to Pending final review in Release 4.10.0 Aug 13, 2024
@damarisg
Copy link
Member

GJ!

@wazuhci wazuhci moved this from Pending final review to Done in Release 4.10.0 Aug 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants