Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Valueoverrides dynamic from extraelementen context #446

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

MLenterman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

…d zgw rol into a single translation from zds rol to zgw rol
…usively match on the primary identifier of the gerelateerde and if not available match on remaining kerngegevens elements
…StUF:extraElementen by using ${extraElementen:<name>} as value
…to zds translation and copy it to the zakLa01 response instead
…tificatie or inp.a-nummer as identifier are not getting deleted
…d back to extraElementen during zgw to zds translations for case roles
@MLenterman MLenterman marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2024 11:59
…d zgw rol into a single translation from zds rol to zgw rol
…usively match on the primary identifier of the gerelateerde and if not available match on remaining kerngegevens elements
…StUF:extraElementen by using ${extraElementen:<name>} as value
…to zds translation and copy it to the zakLa01 response instead
…tificatie or inp.a-nummer as identifier are not getting deleted
…d back to extraElementen during zgw to zds translations for case roles
@MLenterman MLenterman force-pushed the valueoverrides-dynamic-from-extraelementen-context branch from 61c27cd to 86d7077 Compare September 30, 2024 12:45
@MLenterman MLenterman merged commit 6cb5dd6 into master Oct 1, 2024
6 checks passed
@MLenterman MLenterman deleted the valueoverrides-dynamic-from-extraelementen-context branch October 1, 2024 09:49
@WeAreFrank-BOT
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.22.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants