Error about Data.Record.Generic when only large-records dependency is specified

[parsonsmatt]

I added a dependency on large-records-0.4.1 and added the incantation from the docs to my module.

{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fplugin=Data.Record.Plugin #-}

{-# ANN type PerksSecrets largeRecord #-}
data PerksSecrets = PerksSecrets
  { ...
  -- 300 lines of record fields omitted
  }

I then get an error when trying to load the module in GHCi:

• Reloading ghci:
  • src/Handler/Perks/Types.hs

[2 of 2] Compiling Handler.Perks.Types ( src/Handler/Perks/Types.hs, interpreted ) [So
urce file changed]

<no location info>: error:
Failed, one module loaded.
    lookupName: could not find Generic in module Data.Record.Generic. This might be due to an undeclared package dependency on large-generics.
CallStack (from HasCallStack):
  error, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/GHC/Shim.hs:210:23 in large-records-0.4.1-EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.GHC.Shim
  lookupOccName, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/GHC/Shim.hs:189:25 in large-records-0.4.1-EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.GHC.Shim
  lookupTcName, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/Plugin/Names.hs:130:38 in large-records-0.4.1-EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.Plugin.Names

If I add the dependency to large-generics, then I get another error, this time about record-hasfield:

<no location info>: error:
Failed, one module loaded.
    lookupName: could not find HasField in module GHC.Records.Compat. This might be du
e to an undeclared package dependency on record-hasfield.
CallStack (from HasCallStack):
  error, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/GHC/Shim.hs:210:23 in large-records-0.4.1-
EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.GHC.Shim
  lookupOccName, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/GHC/Shim.hs:189:25 in large-record
s-0.4.1-EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.GHC.Shim
  lookupTcName, called at src/Data/Record/Internal/Plugin/Names.hs:167:32 in large-rec
ords-0.4.1-EVeX1bYy7hr25mSqLxjile:Data.Record.Internal.Plugin.Names

I feel like something is going wrong here - either I've done goofed or GHC is having a bad time. We are using GHC 9.6.3 with some patches that are probably unrelated.