You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
After the update the JSON file for the 2024 field image appears to still be incorrect.
The value 1008 probbly should be 1108.
Also curious how the values were derived?
In looking at a zoomed in file, it seems that values should be 112, 27, 1108, 522. Except for the 1008, these are only very slightly different than the JSON.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Use the field in one of the applications that displays fields and visually review.
Yes the 1008 is a typo, #6185 changes to a better image and fixes the dimensions. I suspect that the +/- 2 pixel is just a difference in exactly where it's measured, since there's a gradient.
Describe the bug
After the update the JSON file for the 2024 field image appears to still be incorrect.
The value 1008 probbly should be 1108.
Also curious how the values were derived?
In looking at a zoomed in file, it seems that values should be 112, 27, 1108, 522. Except for the 1008, these are only very slightly different than the JSON.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
https://github.com/wpilibsuite/allwpilib/blob/main/fieldImages/src/main/native/resources/edu/wpi/first/fields/2024-crescendo.json
Expected behavior
The entire field should be viewable.
Screenshots
N/A
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: