Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

patch: replace genericDoReason error reason with unknown #490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

denopink
Copy link
Contributor

  • unknown will be used for failures that don't fit existing categories

- `unknown` will be used for failures that don't fit existing categories
@denopink denopink added the bug label Oct 22, 2024
@denopink denopink self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.91%. Comparing base (d75d1cd) to head (198e0d2).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #490      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.98%   58.91%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1865     1862       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         1100     1097       -3     
  Misses        723      723              
  Partials       42       42              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.91% <100.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@denopink denopink merged commit c4b4c6a into main Oct 22, 2024
19 checks passed
@denopink denopink deleted the denopink/patch/replace-genericDoReason branch October 22, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant