[#29] Better wording here and there

terminology/terminology.tex

@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ \section{Allograph}
 \end{center}
 
 \section{Hieroglyph and glyph}
-The term \emph{hieroglyph} or \emph{glyph} is not an exact term.
-In epigraphic literature, a \emph{glyph} is considered to be a group of one or more graphemes.
-They can represent a syllable, single words or even a whole phrase 
+The term \emph{hieroglyph} and \emph{glyph} are not precise terms.
+Both are used in epigraphic literature, to address a group of one or more graphemes.
+They are considered to be equivalent and interchangeable throughout this work.
+\emph{Glyphs} can represent a syllable, single words or even a whole phrase 
 (\cite[1]{bricker1986}, (\cite[23]{macrilooper2003})).
 For example, the glyph~\ref{fig:terminology-glyphs-utzapaw} consists of the 
 graphemes \grapheme{u}, \grapheme{tz\glottalstop{}a} and \grapheme{wa} representing the phrase
@@ -56,7 +57,11 @@ \section{Hieroglyph and glyph}
 \end{figure}
 
 \section{Glyph block and collocation}
-\emph{Glyphs} are usually arranged in regular rectangular shapes called a \emph{glyph block}.
+One or more \emph{Glyphs} are usually arranged in regular rectangular shapes called a 
+\emph{glyph block}.
+Sometimes they are also called \emph{collocation}.
+\textcquote[1]{bricker1986}{A ``collocation'' is a group of signs that occupies a 
+defined space, or block, in a hieroglyphic text.}
 \textcquote[23]{macrilooper2003}{The rectangular shape of \emph{glyph blocks} results from 
 the arrangement of texts into rows and columns}.
 \todo{Image/drawing which shows rows and columns of glyphs}