[#29] Maya context for pillar 'cultural context'

terminology/terminology.tex

@@ -215,16 +215,16 @@ \subsubsection{The Rosetta Stone}
     \label{fig:terminology-ptolemy-cartouche}
 \end{center}
 
-\subsubsection{Maya rulers of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}}
+\subsubsection{Maya rulers of \chichenitza}
 David Kelley was able to show that names of Maya rulers occur in the inscriptions and in colonial
 sources from the 16th century.
-On several inscriptions in the temple of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}, Herman Beyer (\cite{beyer1937}) 
+On several inscriptions in the temple of \chichenitza, Herman Beyer (\cite{beyer1937}) 
 found several similar sign collocations.
 David Kelley could proof that these sequences of signs actually represent a
 name of a Maya ruler (\cite{kelley1962a}). 
 With the help of Landa's abecedary (\Cref{fig:terminology-landa-relacion-folio-45r}) and 
 Yuri Knorozov decipherments (\cite{knorozov1967}) David Kelley found that these sign collocations 
-denote the name of the Maya ruler \mayan{K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal} 
+denote the name of the Maya ruler \kakupakal 
 (\cite[304-5]{kelley1962c}).
 When he cross-referenced this name (\cite[\ppno~259--266]{kelley1968}) with the book of 
 Chilam Balam of Chumayel 
@@ -239,6 +239,10 @@ \subsubsection{Maya rulers of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}}
     Chakanputun perished at the hands of Kak-u-pacal and Tec Uilu[e].]
 \end{quote}
 % LTeX: enabled=true
+Even though the identity of \mayan{Kakupakal} from the colonial sources and \kakupakal from the 
+inscriptions in \chichenitza is doubtful, reading a Maya ruler's phonetically and the fact that 
+both figures lived in the same region of \chichenitza encouraged the phonetic approach 
+in the decipherment of Maya hieroglyphs.
 
 % LTeX: enabled=false
 \begin{figure}
@@ -253,13 +257,13 @@ \subsubsection{Maya rulers of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}}
         \includegraphics[width=0.30\textwidth]{img/chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
         \label{fig:terminology-chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
     }
-    \caption[K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal in the colonial sources and inscriptions]
-             {The name \mayan{K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal} in the colonial sources and 
-             in the inscriptions of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}.
+    \caption[\kakupakal in the colonial sources and inscriptions]
+             {The name \kakupakal in the colonial sources and 
+             in the inscriptions of \chichenitza.
              \subref{fig:terminology-chilam-balam-kakupakal} page 43r from the book of 
              Chilam Balam of Chumayel.
              \subref{fig:terminology-chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
-             Hieroglyphic writing from Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a} Monjas Lintel 2 (B1) (\authordrawings).}
+             Hieroglyphic writing from \chichenitza Monjas Lintel 2 (B1) (\authordrawings).}
 \end{figure}
 % LTeX: enabled=true