Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[#29] Writing limitations
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
yax-lakam-tuun committed May 22, 2023
1 parent eee13c7 commit a144331
Showing 1 changed file with 36 additions and 22 deletions.
58 changes: 36 additions & 22 deletions terminology/terminology.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ \section{Grapheme}
The term \emph{sign} and \emph{grapheme} are considered to be equivalent and
interchangeable throughout this work.

\section{Allograph}
\section{Graph and allograph}
\textcquote[204]{crystal2010}{Graphemes are abstract units which may adopt a variety of forms
\elide Each of these possible forms is known as \emph{graphs}\elide
There is a vast amount of physical variation in the shapes of graphs that does not affect the
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -94,38 +94,56 @@ \section{Cataloging of signs}
(e.g. A for animals, M for signs with hands etc.) whereas the third digit is an arbitrary number
sequencing the different graphemes.

Mayawoerterbuch (classicmayan.org)
TODO Mayawoerterbuch (classicmayan.org)


\subsection{Problems and limitations}
Having all these sign catalogs are huge help to systematically analyze the Maya writing system.
Identifying graphemes are crucial to decipher the meaning of the signs.
One way to do this, is by segmentation of the texts into distinct graphemes.
Having all these sign catalogs are a huge help to systematically analyze any writing system.
It is especially important when the writing system cannot be read.
As one could see above, researchers assign codes or numbers to address individual or
even groups of signs.
Therefore, identifying graphemes are crucial to systematically build up a sign catalog.
Yet, determine them in an unknown writing system is challenging.
One way to approach this, is by segmenting the texts into distinct \emph{graphs} .
Researchers hereby followed the assumption that graphemes of a script are considered the same if
they resemble each other in more features than either resembles any other.
\textcquote[34]{knorozov1967}{Two [signs] are identical when they are both composed of the same
graphic elements\elide, whose drawing and disposition is sufficiently similar to allow them to
be identified.}
be identified}.
However, if there is no control in terms of linguistics and content,
identifying graphemes can be challenging and even be problematic.
this approach can be problematic.
Three major issues can occur when segmenting signs from an unknown writing system:
\begin{itemize}
\item Allographs are interpreted as separate graphemes.
\item Graphemes with distinct phonemes and meanings are interpreted as allographs.
\item Complex graphemes are split into its sub-graphemic components.
\end{itemize}

Especially in writing systems with many allographs like the Maya hieroglyphs,
allographs are sometimes not recognized and, instead, are interpreted as separate graphemes.
Another problem is that some signs are considered to be separate graphemes,
but, as later progress in decipherment has shown, were actually allographs.
Eric Thompson (\cite[12\psq]{thompson1962catalog}) also recognized the method of segmentation as
Another problem is that some signs are considered to be allographs because of their similarities,
but, as later progress in decipherment has shown, were actually distinct graphemes.
Eric Thompson (\cite[12\psq]{thompson1962catalog}) recognized the method of segmentation as
a potential source of false conclusions.
David H. Kelley (\cite{kelley1962}) showed in his review of Thompson's sign catalog that
some T-numbers represent more than one grapheme (e.g. TODO) and some
T-numbers are allographs of another (e.g. TODO).






PAS example for over-splitting (Tikal Temple IV, Lintel 2 A7)

Despite merging unrelated graphs or separating allographs which actually belong to each other,
the Maya writing system also utilized graphemes which consist of two or more subgraphemic
components.
Those complex graphemes might not be recognized and therefore only its components are registered
as graphemes.
One of those complex graphemes, is the grapheme \grapheme{pas} ``dawn''
(\ref{fig:terminology-glyphs-pas}) which is built from
grapheme \grapheme{chan} ``sky'' (\ref{fig:terminology-glyphs-chan}),
grapheme \grapheme{k\glottalstop} ``k\glottalstop{}in'' (\ref{fig:terminology-glyphs-kin}) and
grapheme \grapheme{kab} ``earth'' (\ref{fig:terminology-glyphs-kab}).
It can be found, for example, on Tikal Temple IV, Lintel 2 A7.
All three components are graphemes themselves, but in combination they form the complex
grapheme \grapheme{pas} with its phoneme and meaning.
This grapheme doesn't show up in Thompson's sign catalog.
Later revisions and new catalogs like Macri and Looper (\cite{macrilooper2003}) added it as
separate grapheme and assigned it the code ZX2.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\textwidth}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -158,8 +176,4 @@ \subsection{Problems and limitations}
(\cite[139]{prager2018}).}
\end{figure}


\section{Characteristics in Maya writing}


\end{document}

0 comments on commit a144331

Please sign in to comment.