[#29] Maya context for pillar 'cultural context'

references.bib

@@ -68,7 +68,17 @@ @book{thompson1962
   year           = {1962}
 }
 
-@inbook{kelley1962,
+@article{kelley1962a,
+  author          = {Kelley, David H.},
+  journal         = {American Antiquity},
+  number          = {3},
+  title           = {Glyphic Evidence for a Dynastic Sequence at Quirigua, Guatemala},
+  volume          = {27},
+  pages           = {323-335},
+  year            = {1962}
+}
+
+@inbook{kelley1962b,
   author         = {Kelley, David H.},
   chapter        = {Reviewed Work: A Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs by J. Eric S. Thompson},
   pages          = {436-438},
@@ -79,6 +89,17 @@ @inbook{kelley1962
   doi            = {https://doi.org/10.2307/502055},
 }
 
+@article{kelley1968,
+  author          = {Kelley, David H.},
+  journal         = {Estudios de Cultura Maya},
+  title           = {Kakupacal and the Itzas},
+  volume          = {7},
+  pages           = {255-268},
+  publisher       = {Mexico: Universidad Nacional Aut\'{o}noma de M\'{e}xico},
+  year            = {1968},
+  doi             = {https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.1968.7.703},
+}
+
 @book{gelb1963,
   author         = {Gelb, Ignace Jay},
   publisher      = {University of Chicago Press, Chicago},

terminology/terminology.tex

@@ -214,6 +214,16 @@ \subsection{Cultural context}
 \end{center}
 
 % LTeX: enabled=false
+
+In the 1960s David Kelley was able to show that a sequence of signs actually represent the name
+of a Maya ruler (\cite{kelley1962a}).
+He could show that with the help of Landa's abecedary 
+(see \ref{fig:terminology-landa-relacion-folio-45r}) several sign sequences in the temples of
+Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a} denote the name of the ruler \mayan{K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal}.
+By cross-referencing this name with the book of Chilam Balam of Chumanyel --- a colonial source
+written in Yucatec Maya with Latin letters he could identify that these inscription indeed
+mention the name of the Maya ruler (\cite{kelley1968}).
+
 Tu uucpiz tun Uaxac Ahau u katunil, laix u katunil cimci Chakanputin tumen Kak-u-pacal yetel Tec Uilue.
 In the seventh tun of Katun 8 Ahau, this was the katun when Chakanputun perished at the hands of Kak-u-pacal and Tec Uilu
 
@@ -250,7 +260,6 @@ \subsection{Cultural context}
     - David H. Kelley - Glyphic Evidence for a Dynastic Sequenced Quirigua
     - David H. Kelley - Kakupakal and the Itzas
 
-
 \subsection{Bilingual, biscript, or similar constraint}
 Any clue as to what the content of the text might be is very important in deciphering an 
 unknown script.
@@ -345,7 +354,7 @@ \subsection{Problems and limitations}
 but, as later progress in decipherment has shown, were actually distinct graphemes.
 Eric Thompson (\cite[12\psq]{thompson1962catalog}) recognized the method of segmentation as 
 a potential source of false conclusions.
-David Kelley (\cite{kelley1962}) was able to show in his review of Thompson's sign catalog that
+David Kelley (\cite{kelley1962b}) was able to show in his review of Thompson's sign catalog that
 some T-numbers represent more than one grapheme 
 (e.g. \thompson{683a} and \thompson{T683b}~\ref{fig:terminology-t683a-t683b}) 
 and some T-numbers are allographs of another