[#29] Cosmetics

terminology/terminology.tex

@@ -235,31 +235,24 @@ \subsection{Cultural context}
     \centering
     \subfloat[][]{
         \centering
-        \includegraphics[width=0.63\textwidth]{img/chilam-balam-kakupakal}
+        \includegraphics[width=0.60\textwidth]{img/chilam-balam-kakupakal}
         \label{fig:terminology-chilam-balam-kakupakal}
     }
     \subfloat[][]{
         \centering
-        \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{img/chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
+        \includegraphics[width=0.30\textwidth]{img/chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
         \label{fig:terminology-chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
     }
     \caption[K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal in the colonial sources and inscriptions]
              {The name \mayan{K\glottalstop{}ak\glottalstop{}upakal} in the colonial sources and 
              in the inscriptions of Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a}.
-             \subref{fig:terminology-chilam-balam-kakupakal} page 51 from the book of 
+             \subref{fig:terminology-chilam-balam-kakupakal} page 43r from the book of 
              Chilam Balam of Chumayel.
              \subref{fig:terminology-chichen-itza-monjas-lintel-2-kakupakal}
              Hieroglyphic writing from Chich\'{e}n Itz\'{a} Monjas Lintel 2 (B1) (\authordrawings).}
 \end{figure}
 % LTeX: enabled=true
 
-
-TODO maya context
-rulers, place names, Colonial sources
-Kakupakal
-    - David H. Kelley - Glyphic Evidence for a Dynastic Sequenced Quirigua
-    - David H. Kelley - Kakupakal and the Itzas
-
 \subsection{Bilingual, biscript, or similar constraint}
 Any clue as to what the content of the text might be is very important in deciphering an 
 unknown script.
@@ -295,7 +288,7 @@ \section{Cataloging of signs}
 and their allographs. 
 In the past, several sign catalogs have been proposed.
 Yuri Knorozov created a sign catalog in his work (\cite[109\psq]{knorozov1967}).
-William E. Gates' and G\"unter Zimmermann's catalogs (\cite{gates1931},~\cite{zimmermann1956}) are 
+William E. Gates' and G\"unter Zimmermann's catalogs (\cites{gates1931}{zimmermann1956}) are 
 based on the Maya codices but did not include the signs from the inscriptions 
 (\cite[4]{thompson1962catalog}). 
 Eric Thompson extended G\"unter Zimmermann's idea and categorized all signs into affixes, main signs