Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency typeguard to ==4.3.* - autoclosed #342

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 27, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
typeguard (changelog) ==4.2.* -> ==4.3.* age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

agronholm/typeguard (typeguard)

v4.3.0

Compare Source

  • Added support for checking against static protocols
  • Fixed some compatibility problems when running on Python 3.13 (#​460; PR by @​JelleZijlstra)
  • Fixed test suite incompatibility with pytest 8.2 (#​461)
  • Fixed pytest plugin crashing on pytest version older than v7.0.0 (even if it's just present) (#​343)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 12pm every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency typeguard to ==4.3.* chore(deps): update dependency typeguard to ==4.3.* - autoclosed Sep 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Sep 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typeguard-4.x branch September 10, 2024 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants